Cruz by his own admission was born in Canada by a woman who claims to be a US citizen. Therefore, Cruz must have adhered to the Naturalization requirements found in Public Law in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.
Public Law 414 CHAPTER 477 AN ACT June 27, 1952
To revise the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality; [H.R. 5678] and for other purposes be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act, divided into titles, chapters, and sections according to the following table of contents, may be cited as the “Immigration and Nationality Act”.
Read it all right here: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf
No matter which category Cruz falls under…he is never natural born, there is always a matter of a process to be naturalized. The question now is …was he ever naturalized? It is no longer a question of natural born…it is now a question of “IS HE A CITIZEN? OR AN ILLEGAL ALIEN?” If he has never been naturalized…he is holding public office as senator illegally and must be removed promptly.
PUBLIC LAW 414-JUNE 27, 1952 [66 STAT.
CHILD BORN OUTSIDE OF UNITED STATES ; NATURALIZATION ON PETITION OF CITIZEN P A R E N T ; REQUIREMENTS AND EXEMPTIONS
SEC. 822. (a) A child born outside of the United States, one or both of whose parents is at the time of petitioning for the naturalization of the child, a citizen of the United States, either by birth or naturalization, may be naturalized if under the age of eighteen years and not otherwise disqualified from becoming a citizen by reason of section 813, 814, 315, or 818 of this Act, and if residing permanently in the United States, with the citizen parent, pursuant to a lawful admission for permanent residence, on the petition of such citizen parent, upon compliance with all the provisions of this title, except that no particular period of residence or physical presence in the United States shall be required. If the child is of tender years he may be presumed to be of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States. (b) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to an adopted child.
Did Ted’s mother fill out the proper consular record of birth abroad papers? If so, where are they?
CHILD BORN OUTSIDE OF UNITED STATES OF ONE ALIEN AND ONE CITIZEN PARENT AT TIME OF BIRTH; CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH CITIZENSHIP AUTOMATICALLY ACQUIRED
SEC. 320. (a) A child born outside of the United States, one of whose parents at the time of the child’s birth was an alien and the other of whose parents then was and never thereafter ceased to be a citizen of the United States, shall, if such alien parent is naturalized, become a citizen of the United States, when—
(1) such naturalization takes place while such child is under the age of sixteen years; and(2) such child is residing in the United States pursuant to a lawful admission for permanent residence at the time of naturalization or thereafter and begins to reside permanently in the United States while under the age of sixteen years.(b) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to an adopted child.
Did Ted’s parents pursue lawful admission for permanent residence at the time of his naturalization? Remember naturalized is not the same as natural born. Was Ted naturalized to be a citizen? Or did Ted receive a Visa when his father applied for his to enter the U.S. in 1974? Did either one have visas?
CHILD BORN OUTSIDE OF UNITED STATES OF ALIEN PARENT; CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH CITIZENSHIP AUTOMATICALLY ACQUIRED
SEC, 321. (a) A child born outside of the United States of alien parents, or of an alien parent and a citizen parent who has subsequently lost citizenship of the United States, becomes a citizen of the United States upon fulfillment of the following conditions: (1) The naturalization of both parents; or (2) The naturalization of the surviving parent if one of the parents is deceased; or (3) The naturalization of the parent having legal custody of the child when there has been a legal separation of the parents or the naturalization of the mother if the child w^as born out of wedlock and the paternity of the child has not been established by legitimation; and if
(4) Such naturalization takes place while such child is under the age of sixteen years; and (5) Such child is residing in the United States pursuant to a lawful admission for permanent residence at the time of the naturalization of the parent last naturalized under clause (1) of this subsection, or the parent naturalized under clause (2) or (3) of this subsection, or thereafter begins to reside permanently in the United States while under the age of sixteen years. (b) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to an adopted child.
Good luck finding out this one. Ted’s father was a Canadian citizen…and no one knows for sure what his mother did. Was she even married to Rafael when she gave birth to Ted? Did she ever even marry him at all? There seems to be no record of marriage in America…were they married in Canada? Why did she print her first married name as the mother and Cruz as the father? Why did she not sign Ted’s Canadian birth certificate as mother Eleanor Cruz instead of Eleanor Wilson?
NOW FOR THE KICKER:
There is however one area of which Cruz could possibly be a U.S. citizen and born in Canada. If and only if his mother never became a Canadian citizen. That area would be if Cruz was born out of wedlock and his mother filled out papers showing he was a U.S. citizen born abroad. But, that would be very unthinkable for Cruz as he has proudly called other person’s mothers who gave birth out of wedlock – whores and their children bastards. Heaven forbid if his mother were a whore and Ted a bastard…(his labels not mine). But is this what Ted is calling settled law? Is this his ace up his anti-New York values sleeve?
CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
SEC. 309. (a) The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (7) of section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one years by legitimation.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in section 405, the provisions of section 301 (a) (7) shall apply to a child born out of wedlock on or after January 13,1941, and prior to the effective date of this Act, as of the date of birth, if the paternity of such child is established before or after the effective date of this Act and while such child is under the age of twenty-one years by legitimation.
(c) Notwithstanding the provision of subsection (a) of this section, a person born, on or after the effective date of this Act, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.
So, let’s take a look at the provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (7) of section 301 (a), and of paragraph (2) of section 308, of this title that shall apply as of the date of birth to a child born out of wedlock on or after the effective date of this Act, if the paternity of such child is established while such child is under the age of twenty-one years by legitimation.
NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
SEC. 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(3) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
Ted’s father was not a U.S. citizen. Neither had a current residence in the United States.
(4) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
Ted’s mother was not physically present in the United States for a continuous period of one year prior to his birth.
(5) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its time prior to the birth of such person;
Canada is not an outlying possession. Ted’s mother was not present in the US one year prior to his birth.
(7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of w’hom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States ‘ or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less ‘ than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age ” of fourteen years: Provided^ That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements ” of this paragraph.
(b) Any person who is a national and citizen of the United States at birth under paragraph (7) of subsection (a), shall lose his nationality and citizenship unless he shall come to the United States prior to attaining the age of twenty-three years and shall immediately following any such coming be continuously physically present in the United State for at least five years: Provided^ That such physical presence follows the attainment of the age of fourteen years and precedes the age of twenty-eight years.
(c) Subsection (b) shall apply to a person born abroad subsequent to May 24, 1934: Provided^ however^ That nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed to alter or affect the citizenship of any person born abroad subsequent to May 24, 1934, who, prior to the effective date of this Act, has taken up a residence in the United States before attaining the age of sixteen years, and thereafter, whether before or after the effective date of this Act, complies or shall comply with the residence requirements for retention of citizenship specified in subsections (g) and (h) of section 201 of the Nationality Act of54 Stat. 1138. 1940, as amended.
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years:
Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.
Ted could be a citizen if his mother had registered his birth with the U.S. Consulate. That would have allowed him to be a citizen. But, not by being natural born on U.S. soil, only citizenship through his mother. The question is – did she fill out such papers at birth?
NATIONALS BUT NOT CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
SEC. 308. Unless otherwise provided in section 301 of this title, the following shall be nationals, but not citizens, of the United States at birth:
(1) A person born in an outlying possession of the United States on or after the date of formal acquisition of such possession;
(2) A person born outside the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are nationals, but not citizens, of the United States, and have had a residence in the United States, or one of its outlying possessions prior to the birth of such person; and
(3) A person of unknown parentage found in an outlying possession of the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in such outlying possession.
For all the required reading, it is looking like at best, without documented proof, Ted is a national at best but not a citizen. His mother did not have a residence in the United States when he was born. Her residence was Canada and she was not working for the Government. Unless she was a C.I.A. operative she was not sent to Canada to spy on anything….so….she gave birth to a Cuban Canadian. Might have been married and might not have?
Dianne Marshall
I am voting for the American all the way!
Please read the PDF docs for yourself. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf You might enjoy the parts about PROHIBITION UPON THE NATURALIZATION OF PERSONS OPPOSED TO GOVERNMENT OR LAW, OR WHO FAVOR TOTALITARIAN FORMS OF GOVERNMENT
SEC. 313. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 405 (b), no person shall hereafter be naturalized as a citizen of the United States—(1) who advocates or teaches, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, opposition to all organized government; or (2) who is a member of or affiliated with (A) the Communist Party of the United States; (B) any other totalitarian party of the United States; (C) the Communist Political Association; (D) the Communist or other totalitarian party or any State of….
About the Author
Discover more from THE MARSHALL REPORT - NEW SITE 2026
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I THINK THAT TED CRUZ PROBABLY ISNT EVEN LEGAL TO BE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .
I SEE TED CRUZ HAS NOT READ THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA “YOU DONT HAVE TO BE BORN IN AMERICA TO BE PRESIDENT ” , TREU BUT YOU MUST HAVE ONE OR BOTH PARENTS LIVING IN THE USA ONE YEAR BEFORE BIRTH TEDDY .
GO BACK TO CANADA EH???
Reblogged this on Flurry of Thoughts.
Dianne Marshall, Thank You and GOD Bless! for compiling these facts. Everyone needs to spread them far and wide to everyone they know.
What a lot of research well presented, Thank You. Alas, I agree with everyone else . Absolutely ,positively , categorically nothing will come of this. Our politicians, (state , local federal), judges , the Potus, corporate , banks, hell, Facebook are all in on this. Their palms are greased too handsomely, which keeps us at a default state of corruption.
In my sinking heart I believe we are in an irreparable condition of moral emaciation. The only one who stands a minuscule chance is Trump. We are reaping the fruits of a Godless society. It’s beyond me why we don’t have plagues over our land like Pharaoh did in Egypt. What cleansing can a good old fashion horde of locust eating our crops bring? Or our water turning to blood, imagine bathing in that! Maybe, the death of our first born would bring us to our knees? Or how about a modern plague like taking our cars away, would we change then? I think we have reached the hardened heart state that Pharaoh was in.
The surest proof is that Cruz was given Canadian citizenship at his birth in 1970. He was not given American citizenship because Canada did not allow dual citizenship until 1977, according to the Canadian government’s own website. How much are those judges being paid off(probably by the Bush crime family) or possibly threatened to not rule that Cruz’ birth records be unsealed? Thanks for another great post, Diane! God bless you all & keep Mr. Trump in your prayers!
a NATURALIZED citizen does not mean you were born in the US…..it means you were NOT born in the US but became a citizen because a parent is a USC? Is that it?
Yes. Natural born is born on US soil to two US citizen parents. Naturalized is becoming a citizen through a process via through illegal alien citizenship process, or a US citizen born abroad filling out the consular of birth abroad papers to prove you are a citizen of the US. All the bases are covered in the act above in the article…..all require a process to claim your citizenship either immediately or allowed a length of time. But, there is a process.
Reblogged this on jmilamdeal and commented:
Here are some facts that our main stream media will never tell, and most people are completely ignorant of all the back room deals & corruption going on in our government.
Very interesting group of facts! It’s a shame that nothing will be done about it, and the elites will simply continue to do what they want. If we had an honest & upright government, Obama would have never been nominated, and a couple of years ago he would have been impeached for treasonous behavior, but that will never happen, even though we know he is a Muslim and has surrounded himself in government offices with other Muslims that are intent on destroying the America we have loved. A real sad state of affairs!
Everything you say is true, but judge after judge has ruled Cruz an American citizen. This is just like Obama. I can’t believe it, but the GOP is doing the same act that the Democrats did in regards to the citizenship status of their candidates, which is, whitewashing it. This to me is the real story. That and the undisputed fact that Cruz was a sitting senator while still a Canadian citizen. Isn’t that against the law? There is certainly conflict of interest.