Introducing the invincible, almost scathingly impossible to convict for she yells and yells and even threatens the Oval Office Command Post – for she believes it is rightfully hers, more like, “MINE, ALL MINE!”, HILLARY CLINTON. She is a wretch of a woman who is in total denial of her absolute inevitable forthcoming jail time. What makes her keep on going? Aside from her obvious total loss of true reality, she is a pro·té·gée of Saul Alinsky the man who wrote the book Rules For Radicals in 1971. Alinsky took the reigns of the protesting hippies and showed them how to organize. He began by cleaning them up and making them look establishment by giving them cookie cutter suits, ties and new hair cuts.
He promptly inducted this new army who would one day attain the majority of all significant bodies in government into his “RULES FOR RADICALS”. This form of tutoring came easy for the newly cleaned up bunch for it was everything they had dreamed of, only in a well organized written form. Today the left have it down pat, as well as the right winged RINO’s and now the conservative silent majority have finally decided to pick up the once banned book and read it. Conservatives are a lot smarter and much more intelligent, so they have all caught on very quickly of how to use the best pieces and leave the hype for the left wing pickers. In a nutshell here are the rules….please read them and be aware they have been the golden pitchforks used by the controlling establishment long before Saul wrote them out for his street soldiers to follow.
Sadly the good people have known of these but never thought to use them for themselves until recently. Please read and employ. I prefer to call them, RULES FOR ELECTING TRUMP.
FROM THE BOOK : “RULES FOR RADICALS”
Let us begin with his famous quote, written in the dedication,
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very
first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to
know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which),
the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and
did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.”
—SAUL ALINSKY
…Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
…The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people.
…The third rule is: Whereever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
…The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
…The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
…The sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
…The seventh rule : is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
…The eighth rule: Keep the pressure on.
…The ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than : the thing itself.
…The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
…The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.
…The twelth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
…The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. — P.126-129
Here are some other key excerpts from Saul’s book:
One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other. A leader may struggle toward a decision and weigh the merits and demerits of a situation which is 52 per cent positive and 48 per cent negative, but once the decision is reached he must assume that his cause is 100 per cent positive and the opposition 100 per cent negative. He can’t toss forever in limbo, and avoid decision. He can’t weigh arguments or reflect endlessly — he must decide and act. — P.134
It should be remembered that you can threaten the enemy and get away with it. You can insult and annoy him, but the one thing that: is: unforgivable and that is certain to get him to react is to laugh at him. This causes irrational anger. — P.134-135
I have on occasion remarked that I felt confident that I could persuade a millionaire on a Friday to subsidize a revolution for Saturday out of which he would make a huge profit on Sunday even though he was certain to be executed on Monday. — P.150
For example, since the Haves publicly pose as the custodians of responsbility, morality, law, and justice (which are frequently strangers to each others), they can be constantly pushed to live up to their own book of morality and regulations. No organizations, including organized religion, can live up to the letter of its own book. You can club them to death with their “book” of rules and regulations. This is what that great revolutionary, Paul of Tarsus, knew when he wrote to the Corinthians: “Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit, for the letter killeth.” — P.152
The difference between fact and history was brought home when I was a visiting professor at a certain Eastern university. Two candidates there were taking their written examinations for the doctorate in community organization and criminology. I persuaded the president of this college to get me a copy of this examination and when I answered the questions the departmental head graded my paper, knowing only that I was an anonymous friend of the president. Three of the questions were on the philosophy of Saul Alinksy. I answered two of them incorrectly. I did not know what my philosophy or motivations were; but they did! — P.168
Many of the lower middle class are members of labor unions, churches, bowling clubs, fraternal, service, and nationality organizations. They are organizations and people that must be worked with as one would work with any other part of our populations — with respect, understanding, and sympathy. To reject them is to lose them by default. They will not shrivel and disappear. You can’t switch channels and get rid of them. This is what you have been doing in your radicalized dream world but they are here and will be. — P.189
The entire book can be read through this on-line PDF. Please read it. You may want to even print it out.
Click to access Rules_for_Radicals.pdf
Isn’t it way past time for all who desire to help TRUMP MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN to know the tactics the enemy has forged on us? Fight fire with fire the old rule goes. I say it’s time to quench their flames with a tsunami of flame retardant! Pile it on Trumpers! Pile it on!
Dianne Marshall
About the Author
Discover more from THE MARSHALL REPORT - NEW SITE 2026
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’ve read several good stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how a lot attempt you put to make this kind of great informative site.
Come to think of it….
Obama has been acting off for a few years also. Peculiar, odd, stumbling over his words when giving them speeches telling us who we are. It was obvious he hasn’t a clue who Americans are. I think it was one of Dianne’s articles that it was questioned, “was Obama drunk hungover maybe?” In the speech after the Paris attack. I just chalked it up to him trying to keep all the lies strightened out. He has gone from ISIS to ISIL to IS to Islamic State. All the talking that makes no sence. Speeches that when he was done he hadn’t said anything. He is so disconnected to the people he doesn’t know how we think. Are maybe it is the old tell them how they think enough times and they will start repeating my words of THIS is how We Americans are. Maybe…..
Or is he truly disconnected, medicated/mind-controlled puppet who is repeating what he’s been told over and over?
K. … Add Jed Bush to the list. He seems kinda off also….Look into his eyes. Lights are on but seem like he comes and goes. The world he wants to create even he wouldn’t want to live in it. What he says makes no sence. … Ben Carson makes no sence as he babbles his stories, taking you down a wild dog trail. … Hillary wild-eyed with uncontrollably lying, making no sence. All of them are low energy. Are they all medicated? If this were science fiction you would think mind-control like the Collage Students with all their wild ( safe-space ) demands seem to be. But this isn’t science fiction. So this can’t be mind-control. Right????
Has it ever occurred to anyone else to wonder why Hillary and her BFF Angela Merkel would want sharia practices in their countries?
Do they think jihadis will allow old, white, grey/blonde women to rule over them? Do they think they are protected should a Caliphate be established?
Does everyone know that Hillary’s major donors to Clinton foundation are all Middle Eastern governments?
That her handler, many say her lover, is Moslem?
Are the real puppet masters, now no longer even hidden! drugging her and propping her up these days? (A victim of her own evil?)
She seems very very oddly mechanical, doesn’t she? And remember she has had a blood clot to the brain at least once. One from leg too.
Two candidates have/had serious pathologies and surgeries:
Clinton brain clots
Carson cancer
Are they dying? Or merely convenient targets for assassination should they be elected? (Because the assassination could be blamed on the known illness)
Both candidates seem off, and sometimes incoherent. Neither is campaigning strenuously.
Both have been identified by Trump as “low energy” or “no stamina”
Lately it has been a constant barrage against Christians. “How can you call yourself a Christian and refuse these poor refugees from Syria.”
They even quote Bible verses. I have seen some who are against the bringing in of refugees falter and become confused.
When I have argued with these non Christians in sheeps clothing, using words of Jesus, they accuse me of cherry picking verses, which of course is what they do. I only do this arguing on the web to give others strength against their attacks with verses that do not support this travesty. They quote ministers, famous writers, even the Koran. I have read their book and I can argue against their lies about that.
By the end of the comment war, I simply say that I believe and that Christ promised that the Holy Spirit would guide me to the right way to see things in confusing times. Then I suggest listening to Christ, and his promised Holy Spirit and not to any other voice, no preacher, no famous person, no other.
Guess what. Arguments end. Every time.
There are many verses that tell otherwise, but one I cherish is this in 2nd John, Beware of Deceivers
7For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. 8Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward. 9Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. 10If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: 11For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.