BREAKING NEWS – TTP (Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement) READ FULL TRANSCRIPTS!
Rubio cast the deciding vote on the TTP fast tract bill. If you like the treasonous documents vote for him. If not…don’t. It is what it is.
Please read the WikiLeaks introduction explaining the TTP Act that was kept secret from the public and recently fast tracked in the legislative branch of government. It is now agreed upon to push forth a fast tracking of international trade agreements that will affect every living soul world wide. Please take the time to download the links and read what it says. By reading and understanding what is within the act itself, it is my hope you will understand the grave sedition our government has befallen.
I want to thank WikiLeaks for securing this information and providing it for the public to read. It is an official government document and being set forth by our constitution that the elected officials of the United States Government are selected of the people by the people to serve them, each American is entitled to review the documents for their own knowledge and awareness.
I gratefully acknowledge WikiLeaks for providing this material to the public. I am merely passing it forward.
Dianne Marshall
Under this act we are all slaves to the 1 percent GREAT MERCHANTS OF THE EARTH!
Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) – IP Chapter
Today, 13 November 2013, WikiLeaks released the secret negotiated draft text for the entire TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Intellectual Property Rights Chapter. The TPP is the largest-ever economic treaty, encompassing nations representing more than 40 per cent of the world’s GDP. The WikiLeaks release of the text comes ahead of the decisive TPP Chief Negotiators summit in Salt Lake City, Utah, on 19-24 November 2013. The chapter published by WikiLeaks is perhaps the most controversial chapter of the TPP due to its wide-ranging effects on medicines, publishers, internet services, civil liberties and biological patents. Significantly, the released text includes the negotiation positions and disagreements between all 12 prospective member states.
The TPP is the forerunner to the equally secret US-EU pact TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), for which President Obama initiated US-EU negotiations in January 2013. Together, the TPP and TTIP will cover more than 60 per cent of global GDP. Both pacts exclude China.
Since the beginning of the TPP negotiations, the process of drafting and negotiating the treaty’s chapters has been shrouded in an unprecedented level of secrecy. Access to drafts of the TPP chapters is shielded from the general public. Members of the US Congress are only able to view selected portions of treaty-related documents in highly restrictive conditions and under strict supervision. It has been previously revealed that only three individuals in each TPP nation have access to the full text of the agreement, while 600 ’trade advisers’ – lobbyists guarding the interests of large US corporations such as Chevron, Halliburton, Monsanto and Walmart – are granted privileged access to crucial sections of the treaty text.
The TPP negotiations are currently at a critical stage. The Obama administration is preparing to fast-track the TPP treaty in a manner that will prevent the US Congress from discussing or amending any parts of the treaty. Numerous TPP heads of state and senior government figures, including President Obama, have declared their intention to sign and ratify the TPP before the end of 2013.
WikiLeaks’ Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange stated: “The US administration is aggressively pushing the TPP through the US legislative process on the sly.” The advanced draft of the Intellectual Property Rights Chapter, published by WikiLeaks on 13 November 2013, provides the public with the fullest opportunity so far to familiarise themselves with the details and implications of the TPP.
The 95-page, 30,000-word IP Chapter lays out provisions for instituting a far-reaching, transnational legal and enforcement regime, modifying or replacing existing laws in TPP member states. The Chapter’s subsections include agreements relating to patents (who may produce goods or drugs), copyright (who may transmit information), trademarks (who may describe information or goods as authentic) and industrial design.
The longest section of the Chapter – ’Enforcement’ – is devoted to detailing new policing measures, with far-reaching implications for individual rights, civil liberties, publishers, internet service providers and internet privacy, as well as for the creative, intellectual, biological and environmental commons. Particular measures proposed include supranational litigation tribunals to which sovereign national courts are expected to defer, but which have no human rights safeguards. The TPP IP Chapter states that these courts can conduct hearings with secret evidence. The IP Chapter also replicates many of the surveillance and enforcement provisions from the shelved SOPA and ACTA treaties.
The consolidated text obtained by WikiLeaks after the 26-30 August 2013 TPP meeting in Brunei – unlike any other TPP-related documents previously released to the public – contains annotations detailing each country’s positions on the issues under negotiation. Julian Assange emphasises that a “cringingly obsequious” Australia is the nation most likely to support the hardline position of US negotiators against other countries, while states including Vietnam, Chile and Malaysia are more likely to be in opposition. Numerous key Pacific Rim and nearby nations – including Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia, South Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines and, most significantly, Russia and China – have not been involved in the drafting of the treaty.
In the words of WikiLeaks’ Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange, “If instituted, the TPP’s IP regime would trample over individual rights and free expression, as well as ride roughshod over the intellectual and creative commons. If you read, write, publish, think, listen, dance, sing or invent; if you farm or consume food; if you’re ill now or might one day be ill, the TPP has you in its crosshairs.”
Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei.
Read WikiLeaks editorial on this Chapter – US, Australia isolated in TPP negotiations
Read the full secret TPP treaty IP chapter here
https://wikileaks.org/tpp/pressrelease.html
TTP Documents on Intellectual Property PDF
https://wikileaks.org/tpp/static/pdf/Wikileaks-secret-TPP-treaty-IP-chapter.pdf
About the Author
Discover more from THE MARSHALL REPORT - NEW SITE 2026
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Obama must be immediately impeached and imprisoned for the rest of his natural life! Rubio and anyone else participating in this debacle should be dealt with in the same manner! Nothing that has wide sweeping effects over the public at large should ever be kept secret from the citizens of this country! This reeks of duplicity and cannot possibly be enforced without the public been made aware. Every aspect of it violates the Constitution! Barack Obama is evil incarnate!
Resident aliens at birth cannot run for US president.
lets see those naturalization papers, Marco
I would like to express my affection for your kindness giving support to those people that actually need help with this one concept. Your real dedication to passing the solution throughout appeared to be pretty helpful and has surely encouraged somebody like me to attain their ambitions. Your personal warm and friendly hints and tips signifies this much to me and far more to my fellow workers. Best wishes; from each one of us.
Rubio “launched” this bill and cast the deciding vote? LOL,some people are just gullible.
These trade “deals’ are international agreements which the Supreme Court also recognizes as treaties. (United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, 1937). It isn’t what an item is labeled, but its content, nature, and scope that makes it a treaty. And treaties must be ratified by 2/3 of the U.S. The practice of pushing treaties through without 2/3 requirement Senate confirmation is a violation of every Congressional members oath of office who may vote for such things. Congressional members so violating the Constitution should be removed from office.
All these “trade deals” are treaties and cannot be passed by any other than 2/3 Senate Confirmation. This is required in Art. II, Sect. 2 of the Constitution. NAFTA, and other trade “deals” are illegal. So these can just be cancelled altogether because they were never ratified. In addition, the TPP is not legitimate because it is not in accordance with the design of the United States as set forth in the Constitution. Our government cannot be usurped by a United Nations panel allowed to dictate everything from wages of all workers in the country, to prices and more!
We are to be governed by the rule of law, and our laws are limited to be made through the process of our House of Representatives and our Senate. So TPP is illegal in the first place.
All we need is for our leaders to follow up on this and act accordingly, refusing further implementation of this TPP or any of the other trade deals. Neither is it necessary for the Supreme Court to rule on this as Marbury v. Madison set forth that no court decision is required when something is in violation “repugnant to the Constitution.” This is the genuine meaning of Marbury v. Madision, that such items are “not law,” and are to be ignored as null and void: “A legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law. . . .an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void. . .it be not law. . .The constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature . . .declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally.” – See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/5/137.html…
Contrary to what is often asserted in connection with Marbury v. Madision, it isn’t the Supreme Court that is supreme but the Constitution itself. Thus, Marbury v. Madision was really a Supreme Court decision without a decision actually, because the court concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to rule on the case, and that was coupled with the fact that the law in question, although something Congress had passed did not exist, was “void,” since it was “repugnant to the Constitution.” See?
THIS IS DEPLORABLE! EVERY UNITED STATES NEWSPAPER SHOULD PUT THIS ON IT’S FRONT PAGE TO BE SURE ALL AMERICANS READ IT RIGHT AWAY. THIS HAS GOT TO STOP!
Reblogged this on American Voice.