October 13, 2026

6 thoughts on “Black Robes and Unlawful Orders”

  1. Thank you x 3 Dianne Marshall!!! thank you for posting such great articles very informative. A lot of research I feel like we are on the worlds tallest roller coaster about to reach the top. I am so thankful to be living in this time of our history thanks again for all you do may you be blessed!!!

  2. I read a comment today..that may have merit. USDS US Digital Service was created by Obama in 2014. It was the bureaucrat patch job to fix the Obama care website meltdown. Trump Rebranded to DOGE..

  3. There is much controversy over the President’s authority in freezing funds that have been appropriated by Congress. The process by which the President withholds or freezes funds is called impoundment. This became controversial in the 70s when Nixon refused to spend funds on various programs. In the article link below, it states in part:

    President Nixon’s supporters believed that Nixon was managing funds in an inflationary environment using his Take Care powers. “The President’s obligation to faithfully execute the laws plainly includes an obligation to prevent waste. Impounding to save the taxpayer’s dollar has always had the full support of the Congress,” argued Assistant Attorney General Joseph T. Sneed.

    Congress passed the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 in response to the controversy. Title X in the act is commonly referred to as the Impoundment Control Act (or ICA), and it requires the president to report to Congress when he impounds funds as a deferment (or a temporary delay) or a recission (a permanent cancellation) of spending.

    Another effort to give the president more flexibility in controlling how funds allocated by Congress are spent was the Line Item Veto Act of 1996. The act amended the ICA “to authorize the President to cancel in whole any dollar amount of discretionary budget authority, any item of new direct spending, or any limited tax benefit signed into law.” Such moves required certain conditions, including reducing the federal budget deficit and not impairing “essential Government functions” or causing “harm” to “the national interest.” Congress could override a spending cancellation by the president using an expedited process.

    Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Antonin Scalia, believed the Line Item Veto Act was constitutional.

    https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/can-a-president-refuse-to-spend-funds-approved-by-congress

    There are going to be more questions about the role of the executive branch and legislative branch in regard to federal spending. What will we learn? Does this matter if this is a military operation? Does this matter if we are still a corporation?

    1. We the people are getting a lesson in our responsibility and power held in the running of our government. Voting was only one part of our responsibility… there is so much more and we were not taught our responsibilities. That is why we became enslaved by those who did know – the ones who ran the big businesses… the industrial giants they once called tycoons and they held the trusts. They set up the foundations and bureaucracies and controlled through philanthropy. These great merchants of the earth have chewed up humanity and was spitting them out. (That’s the nutshell of it). Trump is giving us our country back – our power back to the people. We the people had no idea of our power or how to use it. Smile.

    1. It is all getting cleaned up and exposed. It was infiltrated on all levels. The transparency is off the charts. In all of the ways of theft and abuse by the branches of government and the corporate conglomerates. It’s actually a positive time to behold.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from THE MARSHALL REPORT - NEW SITE 2026

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading